[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190626194805.GG27733@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:48:05 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Catherine Sullivan <csully@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
Jon Olson <jonolson@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 4/4] gve: Add ethtool support
> +static int gve_get_sset_count(struct net_device *netdev, int sset)
> +{
> + struct gve_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> + if (!netif_carrier_ok(netdev))
> + return 0;
That is pretty unusual. What goes wrong if there is no carrier and
statistics are returned?
> +static void
> +gve_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct ethtool_stats *stats, u64 *data)
> +{
> + struct gve_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
> + u64 rx_pkts, rx_bytes, tx_pkts, tx_bytes;
> + int ring;
> + int i;
> +
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + if (!netif_carrier_ok(netdev))
> + return;
> +
> + for (rx_pkts = 0, rx_bytes = 0, ring = 0;
> + ring < priv->rx_cfg.num_queues; ring++) {
> + rx_pkts += priv->rx[ring].rpackets;
> + rx_bytes += priv->rx[ring].rbytes;
> + }
> + for (tx_pkts = 0, tx_bytes = 0, ring = 0;
> + ring < priv->tx_cfg.num_queues; ring++) {
> + tx_pkts += priv->tx[ring].pkt_done;
> + tx_bytes += priv->tx[ring].bytes_done;
> + }
> + memset(data, 0, GVE_MAIN_STATS_LEN * sizeof(*data));
Maybe you should do this memset when the carrier is off?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists