netdev - RE: [EXT] [PATCH net-next 05/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.sbq_buf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR18MB269776CBA6B979855AD215A8ABE20@DM6PR18MB2697.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:36:47 +0000
From:   Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>
To:     Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>,
        GR-Linux-NIC-Dev <GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH net-next 05/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.sbq_buf_size

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 1:19 PM
> To: Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>; GR-Linux-NIC-Dev <GR-Linux-
> NIC-Dev@...vell.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH net-next 05/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.sbq_buf_size
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tx rings have sbq_buf_size = 0 but there's no case where the code actually
> tests on that value. We can remove sbq_buf_size and use a constant instead.
> 

Seems relevant to RX ring, not the TX ring ?