netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 11/95] bpf, riscv: clear target register high 32-bits for and/or/xor on ALU32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190627003021.19867-11-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:28:56 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
        Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 11/95] bpf, riscv: clear target register high 32-bits for and/or/xor on ALU32

From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit fe121ee531d1362810bfd30f38a1b88b1d3d376c ]

When using 32-bit subregisters (ALU32), the RISC-V JIT would not clear
the high 32-bits of the target register and therefore generate
incorrect code.

E.g., in the following code:

  $ cat test.c
  unsigned int f(unsigned long long a,
  	       unsigned int b)
  {
  	return (unsigned int)a & b;
  }

  $ clang-9 -target bpf -O2 -emit-llvm -S test.c -o - | \
  	llc-9 -mattr=+alu32 -mcpu=v3
  	.text
  	.file	"test.c"
  	.globl	f
  	.p2align	3
  	.type	f,@function
  f:
  	r0 = r1
  	w0 &= w2
  	exit
  .Lfunc_end0:
  	.size	f, .Lfunc_end0-f

The JIT would not clear the high 32-bits of r0 after the
and-operation, which in this case might give an incorrect return
value.

After this patch, that is not the case, and the upper 32-bits are
cleared.

Reported-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 80b12aa5e10d..e5c8d675bd6e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -759,14 +759,20 @@ static int emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 	case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
 		emit(rv_and(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
+		if (!is64)
+			emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
 		break;
 	case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
 		emit(rv_or(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
+		if (!is64)
+			emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
 		break;
 	case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
 		emit(rv_xor(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
+		if (!is64)
+			emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
 		break;
 	case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
-- 
2.20.1