netdev - Re: [for-next V2 08/10] linux/dim: Implement rdma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54f580a7-e94a-04b9-1472-5c543ad03f57@mellanox.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 05:25:23 +0000
From:   Yamin Friedman <yaminf@...lanox.com>
To:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
CC:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        Tal Gilboa <talgi@...lanox.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next V2 08/10] linux/dim: Implement rdma_dim


On 6/26/2019 1:02 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>> +void rdma_dim(struct dim *dim, u64 completions)
>> +{
>> +    struct dim_sample *curr_sample = &dim->measuring_sample;
>> +    struct dim_stats curr_stats;
>> +    u32 nevents;
>> +
>> +    dim_update_sample_with_comps(curr_sample->event_ctr + 1,
>> +                     curr_sample->pkt_ctr,
>> +                     curr_sample->byte_ctr,
>> +                     curr_sample->comp_ctr + completions,
>> +                     &dim->measuring_sample);
>
> If this is the only caller, why add pkt_ctr and byte_ctr at all?


We wanted to keep the API general enough that if someone wants to 
implement a different algorithm using the dim library they will be able 
to use all the possible statistics. I agree though that in the rdma_dim 
function there is no point in making it seem like they are relevant 
parameters.