[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190627.111705.1141002003036720021.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linyunsheng@...wei.com
Cc: hkallweit1@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xuwei5@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: link_watch: prevent starvation when
processing linkwatch wq
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:28:04 +0800
> So It is ok for me to fall back to reschedule the link watch wq
> every 100 items, or is there a better way to fix it properly?
Yes, that is fine for now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists