lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190627003616.20767-49-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:36:04 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Matt Mullins <mmullins@...com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 49/60] bpf: fix nested bpf tracepoints with per-cpu data

From: Matt Mullins <mmullins@...com>

[ Upstream commit 9594dc3c7e71b9f52bee1d7852eb3d4e3aea9e99 ]

BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINTs can be executed nested on the same CPU, as
they do not increment bpf_prog_active while executing.

This enables three levels of nesting, to support
  - a kprobe or raw tp or perf event,
  - another one of the above that irq context happens to call, and
  - another one in nmi context
(at most one of which may be a kprobe or perf event).

Fixes: 20b9d7ac4852 ("bpf: avoid excessive stack usage for perf_sample_data")
Signed-off-by: Matt Mullins <mmullins@...com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 6c28d519447d..83c4e76f513a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -365,8 +365,6 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_read_value_proto = {
 	.arg4_type	= ARG_CONST_SIZE,
 };
 
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_sample_data, bpf_trace_sd);
-
 static __always_inline u64
 __bpf_perf_event_output(struct pt_regs *regs, struct bpf_map *map,
 			u64 flags, struct perf_sample_data *sd)
@@ -398,24 +396,50 @@ __bpf_perf_event_output(struct pt_regs *regs, struct bpf_map *map,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Support executing tracepoints in normal, irq, and nmi context that each call
+ * bpf_perf_event_output
+ */
+struct bpf_trace_sample_data {
+	struct perf_sample_data sds[3];
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_trace_sample_data, bpf_trace_sds);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_trace_nest_level);
 BPF_CALL_5(bpf_perf_event_output, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
 	   u64, flags, void *, data, u64, size)
 {
-	struct perf_sample_data *sd = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_trace_sd);
+	struct bpf_trace_sample_data *sds = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_trace_sds);
+	int nest_level = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_trace_nest_level);
 	struct perf_raw_record raw = {
 		.frag = {
 			.size = size,
 			.data = data,
 		},
 	};
+	struct perf_sample_data *sd;
+	int err;
 
-	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_INDEX_MASK)))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nest_level > ARRAY_SIZE(sds->sds))) {
+		err = -EBUSY;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	sd = &sds->sds[nest_level - 1];
+
+	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_INDEX_MASK))) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	perf_sample_data_init(sd, 0, 0);
 	sd->raw = &raw;
 
-	return __bpf_perf_event_output(regs, map, flags, sd);
+	err = __bpf_perf_event_output(regs, map, flags, sd);
+
+out:
+	this_cpu_dec(bpf_trace_nest_level);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_output_proto = {
@@ -772,16 +796,48 @@ pe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 /*
  * bpf_raw_tp_regs are separate from bpf_pt_regs used from skb/xdp
  * to avoid potential recursive reuse issue when/if tracepoints are added
- * inside bpf_*_event_output, bpf_get_stackid and/or bpf_get_stack
+ * inside bpf_*_event_output, bpf_get_stackid and/or bpf_get_stack.
+ *
+ * Since raw tracepoints run despite bpf_prog_active, support concurrent usage
+ * in normal, irq, and nmi context.
  */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, bpf_raw_tp_regs);
+struct bpf_raw_tp_regs {
+	struct pt_regs regs[3];
+};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_raw_tp_regs, bpf_raw_tp_regs);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_raw_tp_nest_level);
+static struct pt_regs *get_bpf_raw_tp_regs(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_raw_tp_regs *tp_regs = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_raw_tp_regs);
+	int nest_level = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_raw_tp_nest_level);
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nest_level > ARRAY_SIZE(tp_regs->regs))) {
+		this_cpu_dec(bpf_raw_tp_nest_level);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+	}
+
+	return &tp_regs->regs[nest_level - 1];
+}
+
+static void put_bpf_raw_tp_regs(void)
+{
+	this_cpu_dec(bpf_raw_tp_nest_level);
+}
+
 BPF_CALL_5(bpf_perf_event_output_raw_tp, struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args *, args,
 	   struct bpf_map *, map, u64, flags, void *, data, u64, size)
 {
-	struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_raw_tp_regs);
+	struct pt_regs *regs = get_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
+	int ret;
+
+	if (IS_ERR(regs))
+		return PTR_ERR(regs);
 
 	perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
-	return ____bpf_perf_event_output(regs, map, flags, data, size);
+	ret = ____bpf_perf_event_output(regs, map, flags, data, size);
+
+	put_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_output_proto_raw_tp = {
@@ -798,12 +854,18 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_output_proto_raw_tp = {
 BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_raw_tp, struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args *, args,
 	   struct bpf_map *, map, u64, flags)
 {
-	struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_raw_tp_regs);
+	struct pt_regs *regs = get_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
+	int ret;
+
+	if (IS_ERR(regs))
+		return PTR_ERR(regs);
 
 	perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
 	/* similar to bpf_perf_event_output_tp, but pt_regs fetched differently */
-	return bpf_get_stackid((unsigned long) regs, (unsigned long) map,
-			       flags, 0, 0);
+	ret = bpf_get_stackid((unsigned long) regs, (unsigned long) map,
+			      flags, 0, 0);
+	put_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto_raw_tp = {
@@ -818,11 +880,17 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto_raw_tp = {
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_raw_tp, struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args *, args,
 	   void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags)
 {
-	struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_raw_tp_regs);
+	struct pt_regs *regs = get_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
+	int ret;
+
+	if (IS_ERR(regs))
+		return PTR_ERR(regs);
 
 	perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
-	return bpf_get_stack((unsigned long) regs, (unsigned long) buf,
-			     (unsigned long) size, flags, 0);
+	ret = bpf_get_stack((unsigned long) regs, (unsigned long) buf,
+			    (unsigned long) size, flags, 0);
+	put_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stack_proto_raw_tp = {
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ