[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190627213058.3028-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:30:58 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
syzbot+d6636a36d3c34bd88938@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [Patch net] netrom: fix a memory leak in nr_rx_frame()
When the skb is associated with a new sock, just assigning
it to skb->sk is not sufficient, we have to set its destructor
to free the sock properly too.
Reported-by: syzbot+d6636a36d3c34bd88938@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
---
net/netrom/af_netrom.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
index 86b87925ef34..96740d389377 100644
--- a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
+++ b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ int nr_rx_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
unsigned short frametype, flags, window, timeout;
int ret;
- skb->sk = NULL; /* Initially we don't know who it's for */
+ skb_orphan(skb);
/*
* skb->data points to the netrom frame start
@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ int nr_rx_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
window = skb->data[20];
skb->sk = make;
+ skb->destructor = sock_efree;
make->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED;
/* Fill in his circuit details */
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists