[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190628153552.78a8c5ad@carbon>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:35:52 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jaswinder.singh@...aro.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, bjorn.topel@...el.com,
magnus.karlsson@...el.com, daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org,
makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3, net-next] net: netsec: add XDP support
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:39:15 +0300
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org> wrote:
> +static int netsec_xdp_setup(struct netsec_priv *priv, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct net_device *dev = priv->ndev;
> + struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
> +
> + /* For now just support only the usual MTU sized frames */
> + if (prog && dev->mtu > 1500) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Jumbo frames not supported on XDP");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + if (netif_running(dev))
> + netsec_netdev_stop(dev);
> +
> + /* Detach old prog, if any */
> + old_prog = xchg(&priv->xdp_prog, prog);
> + if (old_prog)
> + bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
> +
> + if (netif_running(dev))
> + netsec_netdev_open(dev);
Shouldn't the if-statement be if (!netif_running(dev))
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists