netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Sub ns increment fixes in Macb PTP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190629.110932.1480107082787858331.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     harini.katakam@...inx.com
Cc:     nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
        claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, rafalo@...ence.com,
        andrei.pistirica@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        harinikatakamlinux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Sub ns increment fixes in Macb PTP

From: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@...inx.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:50:58 +0530

> The subns increment register fields are not captured correctly in the
> driver. Fix the same and also increase the subns incr resolution.
> 
> Sub ns resolution was increased to 24 bits in r1p06f2 version. To my
> knowledge, this PTP driver, with its current BD time stamp
> implementation, is only useful to that version or above. So, I have
> increased the resolution unconditionally. Please let me know if there
> is any IP versions incompatible with this - there is no register to
> obtain this information from.
> 
> Changes from RFC:
> None

Series applied, thanks.