netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier tests for wide stores

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e469767-a108-ba42-f8c8-6fd505393699@fb.com>
Date:   Sun, 30 Jun 2019 06:01:22 +0000
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "Andrii Nakryiko" <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier tests for wide
 stores



On 6/28/19 4:10 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Make sure that wide stores are allowed at proper (aligned) addresses.
> Note that user_ip6 is naturally aligned on 8-byte boundary, so
> correct addresses are user_ip6[0] and user_ip6[2]. msg_src_ip6 is,
> however, aligned on a 4-byte bondary, so only msg_src_ip6[1]
> can be wide-stored.
> 
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   | 17 ++++++--
>   .../selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_store.c       | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_store.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> index c5514daf8865..b0773291012a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
>   			__u64 data64[TEST_DATA_LEN / 8];
>   		};
>   	} retvals[MAX_TEST_RUNS];
> +	enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
>   };
>   
>   /* Note we want this to be 64 bit aligned so that the end of our array is
> @@ -850,6 +851,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
>   	int fd_prog, expected_ret, alignment_prevented_execution;
>   	int prog_len, prog_type = test->prog_type;
>   	struct bpf_insn *prog = test->insns;
> +	struct bpf_load_program_attr attr;
>   	int run_errs, run_successes;
>   	int map_fds[MAX_NR_MAPS];
>   	const char *expected_err;
> @@ -881,8 +883,17 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
>   		pflags |= BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT;
>   	if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
>   		pflags |= BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT;
> -	fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len, pflags,
> -				     "GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 4);
> +
> +	memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
> +	attr.prog_type = prog_type;
> +	attr.expected_attach_type = test->expected_attach_type;
> +	attr.insns = prog;
> +	attr.insns_cnt = prog_len;
> +	attr.license = "GPL";
> +	attr.log_level = 4;
> +	attr.prog_flags = pflags;
> +
> +	fd_prog = bpf_load_program_xattr(&attr, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog));
>   	if (fd_prog < 0 && !bpf_probe_prog_type(prog_type, 0)) {
>   		printf("SKIP (unsupported program type %d)\n", prog_type);
>   		skips++;
> @@ -912,7 +923,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
>   			printf("FAIL\nUnexpected success to load!\n");
>   			goto fail_log;
>   		}
> -		if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err)) {
> +		if (!expected_err || !strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err)) {
>   			printf("FAIL\nUnexpected error message!\n\tEXP: %s\n\tRES: %s\n",
>   			      expected_err, bpf_vlog);
>   			goto fail_log;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_store.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_store.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c6385f45b114
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_store.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR(field, off, res, err) \
> +{ \
> +	"wide store to bpf_sock_addr." #field "[" #off "]", \
> +	.insns = { \
> +	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), \
> +	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, \
> +		    offsetof(struct bpf_sock_addr, field[off])), \
> +	BPF_EXIT_INSN(), \
> +	}, \
> +	.result = res, \
> +	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, \
> +	.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, \
> +	.errstr = err, \
> +}
> +
> +/* user_ip6[0] is u64 aligned */
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(user_ip6, 0, ACCEPT,
> +	      NULL),
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(user_ip6, 1, REJECT,
> +	      "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8"),
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(user_ip6, 2, ACCEPT,
> +	      NULL),
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(user_ip6, 3, REJECT,
> +	      "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8"),
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(user_ip6, 4, REJECT,
> +	      "invalid bpf_context access off=24 size=8"),

With offset 4, we have
#968/p wide store to bpf_sock_addr.user_ip6[4] OK

This test case can be removed. user code typically
won't write bpf_sock_addr.user_ip6[4], and compiler
typically will give a warning since it is out of
array bound. Any particular reason you want to
include this one?


> +
> +/* msg_src_ip6[0] is _not_ u64 aligned */
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(msg_src_ip6, 0, REJECT,
> +	      "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8"),
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(msg_src_ip6, 1, ACCEPT,
> +	      NULL),
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(msg_src_ip6, 2, REJECT,
> +	      "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8"),
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT,
> +	      "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8"),
> +BPF_SOCK_ADDR(msg_src_ip6, 4, REJECT,
> +	      "invalid bpf_context access off=60 size=8"),

The same as above, offset=4 case can be removed?

> +
> +#undef BPF_SOCK_ADDR
>