netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] net: sched: add mpls manipulation actions to TC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7f8a105b-5e9f-327d-f852-2f9e75e3081f@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jul 2019 09:47:36 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        simon.horman@...ronome.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] net: sched: add mpls manipulation actions
 to TC

On 7/1/19 6:30 AM, John Hurley wrote:
> Currently, TC offers the ability to match on the MPLS fields of a packet
> through the use of the flow_dissector_key_mpls struct. However, as yet, TC
> actions do not allow the modification or manipulation of such fields.
> 
> Add a new module that registers TC action ops to allow manipulation of
> MPLS. This includes the ability to push and pop headers as well as modify
> the contents of new or existing headers. A further action to decrement the
> TTL field of an MPLS header is also provided.

Would be good to document an example here and how to handle a label
stack. The same example can be used with the iproute2 patch (I presume
this one ;-)).


> +static int valid_label(const struct nlattr *attr,
> +		       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	const u32 *label = nla_data(attr);
> +
> +	if (!*label || *label & ~MPLS_LABEL_MASK) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "MPLS label out of range");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

core MPLS code (nla_get_labels) checks for MPLS_LABEL_IMPLNULL as well.


> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct nla_policy mpls_policy[TCA_MPLS_MAX + 1] = {
> +	[TCA_MPLS_UNSPEC]	= { .strict_start_type = TCA_MPLS_UNSPEC + 1 },
> +	[TCA_MPLS_PARMS]	= NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct tc_mpls)),
> +	[TCA_MPLS_PROTO]	= { .type = NLA_U16 },
> +	[TCA_MPLS_LABEL]	= NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_U32, valid_label),
> +	[TCA_MPLS_TC]		= NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_U8, 0, 7),
> +	[TCA_MPLS_TTL]		= NLA_POLICY_MIN(NLA_U8, 1),
> +	[TCA_MPLS_BOS]		= NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_U8, 0, 1),
> +};
> +
> +static int tcf_mpls_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> +			 struct nlattr *est, struct tc_action **a,
> +			 int ovr, int bind, bool rtnl_held,
> +			 struct tcf_proto *tp, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	struct tc_action_net *tn = net_generic(net, mpls_net_id);
> +	struct nlattr *tb[TCA_MPLS_MAX + 1];
> +	struct tcf_chain *goto_ch = NULL;
> +	struct tcf_mpls_params *p;
> +	struct tc_mpls *parm;
> +	bool exists = false;
> +	struct tcf_mpls *m;
> +	int ret = 0, err;
> +	u8 mpls_ttl = 0;
> +
> +	if (!nla) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Missing netlink attributes");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = nla_parse_nested(tb, TCA_MPLS_MAX, nla, mpls_policy, extack);
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	if (!tb[TCA_MPLS_PARMS]) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "No MPLS params");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	parm = nla_data(tb[TCA_MPLS_PARMS]);
> +
> +	/* Verify parameters against action type. */
> +	switch (parm->m_action) {
> +	case TCA_MPLS_ACT_POP:
> +		if (!tb[TCA_MPLS_PROTO] ||
> +		    !eth_proto_is_802_3(nla_get_be16(tb[TCA_MPLS_PROTO]))) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid protocol type for MPLS pop");

would be better to call out '!tb[TCA_MPLS_PROTO]' with its own 'Protocol
must be set given for pop' message.