[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a97a92d4-c443-12e1-6d82-1646f9584828@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 09:40:15 -0700
From: Gerd Rausch <gerd.rausch@...cle.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 7/7] net/rds: Initialize ic->i_fastreg_wrs upon
allocation
Otherwise, if an IB connection is torn down before "rds_ib_setup_qp"
is called, the value of "ic->i_fastreg_wrs" is still at zero
(as it wasn't initialized by "rds_ib_setup_qp").
Consequently "rds_ib_conn_path_shutdown" will spin forever,
waiting for it to go back to "RDS_IB_DEFAULT_FR_WR",
which of course will never happen as there are no
outstanding work requests.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Rausch <gerd.rausch@...cle.com>
---
net/rds/ib_cm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rds/ib_cm.c b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
index 1b6fd6c8b12b..4de0214da63c 100644
--- a/net/rds/ib_cm.c
+++ b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
@@ -527,7 +527,6 @@ static int rds_ib_setup_qp(struct rds_connection *conn)
attr.qp_type = IB_QPT_RC;
attr.send_cq = ic->i_send_cq;
attr.recv_cq = ic->i_recv_cq;
- atomic_set(&ic->i_fastreg_wrs, RDS_IB_DEFAULT_FR_WR);
/*
* XXX this can fail if max_*_wr is too large? Are we supposed
@@ -1139,6 +1138,7 @@ int rds_ib_conn_alloc(struct rds_connection *conn, gfp_t gfp)
spin_lock_init(&ic->i_ack_lock);
#endif
atomic_set(&ic->i_signaled_sends, 0);
+ atomic_set(&ic->i_fastreg_wrs, RDS_IB_DEFAULT_FR_WR);
/*
* rds_ib_conn_shutdown() waits for these to be emptied so they
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists