lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190702152051.22513-1-ap420073@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed,  3 Jul 2019 00:20:51 +0900
From:   Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, pablo@...filter.org, laforge@...monks.org,
        osmocom-net-gprs@...ts.osmocom.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ap420073@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH net 1/6] gtp: fix suspicious RCU usage

gtp_encap_enable_socket() and gtp_encap_destroy() are not protected
by rcu_read_lock(). and it's not safe to write sk->sk_user_data.
This patch make these functions to use lock_sock() instead of
rcu_dereference_sk_user_data().

Test commands:
    gtp-link add gtp1

Splat looks like:
[   83.238315] =============================
[   83.239127] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[   83.239702] 5.2.0-rc6+ #49 Not tainted
[   83.240268] -----------------------------
[   83.241205] drivers/net/gtp.c:799 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[   83.243828]
[   83.243828] other info that might help us debug this:
[   83.243828]
[   83.246325]
[   83.246325] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[   83.247314] 1 lock held by gtp-link/1008:
[   83.248523]  #0: 0000000017772c7f (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: __rtnl_newlink+0x5f5/0x11b0
[   83.251503]
[   83.251503] stack backtrace:
[   83.252173] CPU: 0 PID: 1008 Comm: gtp-link Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6+ #49
[   83.253271] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[   83.254562] Call Trace:
[   83.254995]  dump_stack+0x7c/0xbb
[   83.255567]  gtp_encap_enable_socket+0x2df/0x360 [gtp]
[   83.256415]  ? gtp_find_dev+0x1a0/0x1a0 [gtp]
[   83.257161]  ? memset+0x1f/0x40
[   83.257843]  gtp_newlink+0x90/0xa21 [gtp]
[   83.258497]  ? __netlink_ns_capable+0xc3/0xf0
[   83.259260]  __rtnl_newlink+0xb9f/0x11b0
[   83.260022]  ? rtnl_link_unregister+0x230/0x230
[ ... ]

Fixes: 1e3a3abd8b28 ("gtp: make GTP sockets in gtp_newlink optional")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
---
 drivers/net/gtp.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/gtp.c b/drivers/net/gtp.c
index fc45b749db46..939da5442f65 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gtp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gtp.c
@@ -289,12 +289,14 @@ static void gtp_encap_destroy(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct gtp_dev *gtp;
 
-	gtp = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
+	lock_sock(sk);
+	gtp = sk->sk_user_data;
 	if (gtp) {
 		udp_sk(sk)->encap_type = 0;
 		rcu_assign_sk_user_data(sk, NULL);
 		sock_put(sk);
 	}
+	release_sock(sk);
 }
 
 static void gtp_encap_disable_sock(struct sock *sk)
@@ -796,7 +798,8 @@ static struct sock *gtp_encap_enable_socket(int fd, int type,
 		goto out_sock;
 	}
 
-	if (rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sock->sk)) {
+	lock_sock(sock->sk);
+	if (sock->sk->sk_user_data) {
 		sk = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
 		goto out_sock;
 	}
@@ -812,6 +815,7 @@ static struct sock *gtp_encap_enable_socket(int fd, int type,
 	setup_udp_tunnel_sock(sock_net(sock->sk), sock, &tuncfg);
 
 out_sock:
+	release_sock(sock->sk);
 	sockfd_put(sock);
 	return sk;
 }
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ