[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190702.121610.2172819670405515831.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+7966f2a0b2c7da8939b4@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
marc.dionne@...istor.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Fix send on a connected, but unbound socket
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 15:59:12 +0100
> If sendmsg() or sendmmsg() is called on a connected socket that hasn't had
> bind() called on it, then an oops will occur when the kernel tries to
> connect the call because no local endpoint has been allocated.
>
> Fix this by implicitly binding the socket if it is in the
> RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND state, just like it does for the RXRPC_UNBOUND state.
>
> Further, the state should be transitioned to RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND after this
> to prevent further attempts to bind it.
>
> This can be tested with:
...
> Leading to the following oops:
...
> Fixes: 2341e0775747 ("rxrpc: Simplify connect() implementation and simplify sendmsg() op")
> Reported-by: syzbot+7966f2a0b2c7da8939b4@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists