[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190701.193516.551631803622082346.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 19:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: maheshb@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, dja@...ens.net, mahesh@...dewar.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 next 0/3] blackhole device to invalidate dst
From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:38:43 -0700
...
> The idea here is to not alter the data-path with additional
> locks or smb()/rmb() barriers to avoid racy assignments but
> to create a new device that has really low MTU that has
> .ndo_start_xmit essentially a kfree_skb(). Make use of this
> device instead of 'lo' when marking the dst dead.
>
> First patch implements the blackhole device and second
> patch uses it in IPv4 and IPv6 stack while the third patch
> is the self test that ensures the sanity of this device.
...
Series applied to net-next, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists