[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e2dfbf7-6b44-1a41-bc0f-d2810157ef09@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 11:50:24 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix precision tracking
On 06/28/2019 06:24 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> When equivalent state is found the current state needs to propagate precision marks.
> Otherwise the verifier will prune the search incorrectly.
>
> There is a price for correctness:
> before before broken fixed
> cnst spill precise precise
> bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 1923 8128 1863 1898
> bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3077 6707 2468 2666
> bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1062 1062 544 544
> bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 166729 380712 22629 36823
> bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 174607 440652 28805 45325
> bpf_netdev.o 8407 31904 6801 7002
> bpf_overlay.o 5420 23569 4754 4858
> bpf_lxc_jit.o 39389 359445 50925 69631
> Overall precision tracking is still very effective.
>
> Fixes: b5dc0163d8fd ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
> Reported-by: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists