netdev - [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] net: adjust socket level ICW to cope with ipv6 variant of {recv,send}msg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  3 Jul 2019 16:06:54 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] net: adjust socket level ICW to cope with ipv6 variant of {recv,send}msg

After the previous patch we have ipv{6,4} variants for {recv,send}msg,
we should use the generic _INET ICW variant to call into the proper
build-in.

This also allows dropping the now unused and rather ugly _INET4 ICW macro

v1 -> v2:
 - use ICW macro to declare inet6_{recv,send}msg
 - fix a couple of checkpatch offender in the code context

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
---
 net/socket.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 963df5dbdd54..a865708940f9 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -103,13 +103,6 @@
 #include <net/busy_poll.h>
 #include <linux/errqueue.h>
 
-/* proto_ops for ipv4 and ipv6 use the same {recv,send}msg function */
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
-#define INDIRECT_CALL_INET4(f, f1, ...) INDIRECT_CALL_1(f, f1, __VA_ARGS__)
-#else
-#define INDIRECT_CALL_INET4(f, f1, ...) f(__VA_ARGS__)
-#endif
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
 unsigned int sysctl_net_busy_read __read_mostly;
 unsigned int sysctl_net_busy_poll __read_mostly;
@@ -641,10 +634,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sock_tx_timestamp);
 
 INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(int inet_sendmsg(struct socket *, struct msghdr *,
 					   size_t));
+INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(int inet6_sendmsg(struct socket *, struct msghdr *,
+					    size_t));
 static inline int sock_sendmsg_nosec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg)
 {
-	int ret = INDIRECT_CALL_INET4(sock->ops->sendmsg, inet_sendmsg, sock,
-				      msg, msg_data_left(msg));
+	int ret = INDIRECT_CALL_INET(sock->ops->sendmsg, inet6_sendmsg,
+				     inet_sendmsg, sock, msg,
+				     msg_data_left(msg));
 	BUG_ON(ret == -EIOCBQUEUED);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -870,12 +866,15 @@ void __sock_recv_ts_and_drops(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__sock_recv_ts_and_drops);
 
 INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(int inet_recvmsg(struct socket *, struct msghdr *,
-					   size_t , int ));
+					   size_t, int));
+INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(int inet6_recvmsg(struct socket *, struct msghdr *,
+					    size_t, int));
 static inline int sock_recvmsg_nosec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 				     int flags)
 {
-	return INDIRECT_CALL_INET4(sock->ops->recvmsg, inet_recvmsg, sock, msg,
-				   msg_data_left(msg), flags);
+	return INDIRECT_CALL_INET(sock->ops->recvmsg, inet6_recvmsg,
+				  inet_recvmsg, sock, msg, msg_data_left(msg),
+				  flags);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.20.1