[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190703.112459.875695376158111859.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 11:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: maheshb@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, mahesh@...dewar.net,
geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] loopback: fix lockdep splat
From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 23:16:31 -0700
> dev_init_scheduler() and dev_activate() expect the caller to
> hold RTNL. Since we don't want blackhole device to be initialized
> per ns, we are initializing at init.
>
> [ 3.855027] Call Trace:
> [ 3.855034] dump_stack+0x67/0x95
> [ 3.855037] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xd5/0x110
> [ 3.855044] dev_init_scheduler+0xe3/0x120
> [ 3.855048] ? net_olddevs_init+0x60/0x60
> [ 3.855050] blackhole_netdev_init+0x45/0x6e
> [ 3.855052] do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x2fa
> [ 3.855058] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x8c/0xa0
> [ 3.855066] kernel_init_freeable+0x1e5/0x288
> [ 3.855071] ? rest_init+0x260/0x260
> [ 3.855074] kernel_init+0xf/0x180
> [ 3.855076] ? rest_init+0x260/0x260
> [ 3.855078] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
>
> Fixes: 4de83b88c66 ("loopback: create blackhole net device similar to loopack.")
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists