[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190703203650.GF250418@google.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:36:50 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] net: phy: realtek: Enable accessing RTL8211E
extension pages
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:12:12PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 03.07.2019 21:37, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > The RTL8211E has extension pages, which can be accessed after
> > selecting a page through a custom method. Add a function to
> > modify bits in a register of an extension page and a helper for
> > selecting an ext page.
> >
> > rtl8211e_modify_ext_paged() is inspired by its counterpart
> > phy_modify_paged().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - assign .read/write_page handlers for RTL8211E
>
> Maybe this was planned, but it's not part of the patch.
Oops, it was definitely there when I tested ... I guess this got
somehow lost when changing the patch order and resolving minor
conflicts, seems like I only build tested after that :/
> > - use phy_select_page() and phy_restore_page(), get rid of
> > rtl8211e_restore_page()
> > - s/rtl821e_select_ext_page/rtl8211e_select_ext_page/
> > - updated commit message
> > ---
> > drivers/net/phy/realtek.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c b/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c
> > index eb815cbe1e72..9cd6241e2a6d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
> > #define RTL821x_EXT_PAGE_SELECT 0x1e
> > #define RTL821x_PAGE_SELECT 0x1f
> >
> > +#define RTL8211E_EXT_PAGE 7
> > +#define RTL8211E_EPAGSR 0x1e
> > +
> > /* RTL8211E page 5 */
> > #define RTL8211E_EEE_LED_MODE1 0x05
> > #define RTL8211E_EEE_LED_MODE2 0x06
> > @@ -58,6 +61,44 @@ static int rtl821x_write_page(struct phy_device *phydev, int page)
> > return __phy_write(phydev, RTL821x_PAGE_SELECT, page);
> > }
> >
> > +static int rtl8211e_select_ext_page(struct phy_device *phydev, int page)
> > +{
> > + int ret, oldpage;
> > +
> > + oldpage = phy_select_page(phydev, RTL8211E_EXT_PAGE);
> > + if (oldpage < 0)
> > + return oldpage;
> > +
> > + ret = __phy_write(phydev, RTL8211E_EPAGSR, page);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return phy_restore_page(phydev, page, ret);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __maybe_unused rtl8211e_modify_ext_paged(struct phy_device *phydev,
> > + int page, u32 regnum, u16 mask, u16 set)
>
> This __maybe_unused isn't too nice as you use the function in a subsequent patch.
It's needed to avoid a compiler warning (unless we don't care about
that for an interim version), the attribute is removed again in the
next patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists