[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190703220843.GJ250418@google.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 15:08:43 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: net: Add bindings for Realtek PHYs
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:33:27PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I think if we're going to have custom properties for phys, we should
> > have a compatible string to at least validate whether the custom
> > properties are even valid for the node.
>
> Hi Rob
>
> What happens with other enumerable busses where a compatible string is
> not used?
>
> The Ethernet PHY subsystem will ignore the compatible string and load
> the driver which fits the enumeration data. Using the compatible
> string only to get the right YAML validator seems wrong. I would
> prefer adding some other property with a clear name indicates its is
> selecting the validator, and has nothing to do with loading the
> correct driver. And it can then be used as well for USB and PCI
> devices etc.
I also have doubts whether a compatible string is the right answer
here. It's not needed/used by the subsystem, but would it be a
required property because it's needed for validation?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists