[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55f24bfb-4239-dda8-24f8-26b6b2fa9f9e@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 00:19:31 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Validation of forward_delay seems wrong...
On 02/07/2019 23:47, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Nikolay
>
> The man page says that the bridge forward_delay is in units of
> seconds, and should be between 2 and 30.
>
> I've tested on a couple of different kernel versions, and this appears
> to be not working correctly:
>
> ip link set br0 type bridge forward_delay 2
> RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range
>
> ip link set br0 type bridge forward_delay 199
> RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range
>
> ip link set br0 type bridge forward_delay 200
> #
>
> ip link set br0 type bridge forward_delay 3000
> #
>
> ip link set br0 type bridge forward_delay 3001
> RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range
>
> I've not checked what delay is actually being used here, but clearly
> something is mixed up.
>
> grep HZ .config
> CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC=y
> # CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE is not set
> # CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not set
> # CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set
> CONFIG_HZ_FIXED=0
> CONFIG_HZ_100=y
> # CONFIG_HZ_200 is not set
> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
> # CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
> # CONFIG_HZ_500 is not set
> # CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
> CONFIG_HZ=100
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
>
Hi Andrew,
The man page is wrong, these have been in USER_HZ scaled clock_t format from the beginning.
TBH a lot of the time/delay bridge config options are messed up like that.
We've been discussing adding special _ms versions in iproute2 to make them
more user-friendly and understandable. Will cook a patch for the man page.
Cheers,
Nik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists