netdev - Re: [PATCH v5] net: netfilter: Fix rpfilter dropping vrf packets by mistake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b5cc7929a83472e9b2e64d84397eccc@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jul 2019 01:59:47 +0000
From:   linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC:     "pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>,
        "kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu" <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
        "fw@...len.de" <fw@...len.de>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuznet@....inr.ac.ru" <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        "yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        "netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "coreteam@...filter.org" <coreteam@...filter.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] net: netfilter: Fix rpfilter dropping vrf packets by
 mistake

Add David Ahern. @David Ahern I'am so sorry but I rerun scripts/get_maintainer.pl .
You are not in the list , so I forgot to add you to the email-to list. I'am sorry again.
Have a good day.
Best wishes.

When firewalld is enabled with ipv4/ipv6 rpfilter, vrf
ipv4/ipv6 packets will be dropped. Vrf device will pass through netfilter hook twice. One with enslaved device and another one with l3 master device. So in device may dismatch witch out device because out device is always enslaved device.So failed with the check of the rpfilter and drop the packets by mistake.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_rpfilter.c  | 1 +  net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_rpfilter.c | 8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_rpfilter.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_rpfilter.c
index 59031670b16a..cc23f1ce239c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_rpfilter.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_rpfilter.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static bool rpfilter_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_action_param *par)
 	flow.flowi4_mark = info->flags & XT_RPFILTER_VALID_MARK ? skb->mark : 0;
 	flow.flowi4_tos = RT_TOS(iph->tos);
 	flow.flowi4_scope = RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE;
+	flow.flowi4_oif = l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(xt_in(par));
 
 	return rpfilter_lookup_reverse(xt_net(par), &flow, xt_in(par), info->flags) ^ invert;  } diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_rpfilter.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_rpfilter.c
index 6bcaf7357183..d800801a5dd2 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_rpfilter.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_rpfilter.c
@@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ static bool rpfilter_lookup_reverse6(struct net *net, const struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (rpfilter_addr_linklocal(&iph->saddr)) {
 		lookup_flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE;
 		fl6.flowi6_oif = dev->ifindex;
-	} else if ((flags & XT_RPFILTER_LOOSE) == 0)
+	/* Set flowi6_oif for vrf devices to lookup route in l3mdev domain. */
+	} else if (netif_is_l3_master(dev) || netif_is_l3_slave(dev) ||
+		  (flags & XT_RPFILTER_LOOSE) == 0)
 		fl6.flowi6_oif = dev->ifindex;
 
 	rt = (void *)ip6_route_lookup(net, &fl6, skb, lookup_flags); @@ -70,7 +72,9 @@ static bool rpfilter_lookup_reverse6(struct net *net, const struct sk_buff *skb,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (rt->rt6i_idev->dev == dev || (flags & XT_RPFILTER_LOOSE))
+	if (rt->rt6i_idev->dev == dev ||
+	    l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(rt->rt6i_idev->dev) == dev->ifindex ||
+	    (flags & XT_RPFILTER_LOOSE))
 		ret = true;
  out:
 	ip6_rt_put(rt);
--
2.21.GIT