[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN8PR12MB3266BC5322AADFAC49D9BAFAD3FA0@BN8PR12MB3266.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:13:37 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for Page
Pool
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> The page_pool DMA mapping cannot be "kept" when page traveling into the
> network stack attached to an SKB. (Ilias and I have a long term plan[1]
> to allow this, but you cannot do it ATM).
The reason I recycle the page is this previous call to:
skb_copy_to_linear_data()
So, technically, I'm syncing to CPU the page(s) and then memcpy to a
previously allocated SKB ... So it's safe to just recycle the mapping I
think.
Its kind of using bounce buffers and I do see performance gain in this
(I think the reason is because my setup uses swiotlb for DMA mapping).
Anyway, I'm open to some suggestions on how to improve this ...
> Also remember that the page_pool requires you driver to do the DMA-sync
> operation. I see a dma_sync_single_for_cpu(), but I didn't see a
> dma_sync_single_for_device() (well, I noticed one getting removed).
> (For some HW Ilias tells me that the dma_sync_single_for_device can be
> elided, so maybe this can still be correct for you).
My HW just needs descriptors refilled which are in different coherent
region so I don't see any reason for dma_sync_single_for_device() ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists