[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB32692AA2F18A530D56383739D3FA0@BYAPR12MB3269.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 15:18:19 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for Page
Pool
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> You can just use page_pool_free() (p.s I'm working on reintroducing
> page_pool_destroy wrapper). As you say, you will not have in-flight
> frames/pages in this driver use-case.
Well, if I remove the request_shutdown() it will trigger the "API usage
violation" WARN ...
I think this is due to alloc cache only be freed in request_shutdown(),
or I'm having some leak :D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists