netdev - [RFC bpf-next 6/8] bpf: migrate zero extension opt to list patching infra

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1562275611-31790-7-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Date:   Thu,  4 Jul 2019 22:26:49 +0100
From:   Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
To:     alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     ecree@...arflare.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        andriin@...com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next 6/8] bpf: migrate zero extension opt to list patching infra

This patch migrate 32-bit zero extension insertion to new list patching
infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 30ed28e..58d6bbe 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -8549,10 +8549,9 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 					 const union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	struct bpf_insn *patch, zext_patch[2], rnd_hi32_patch[4];
-	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux = env->insn_aux_data;
-	int i, patch_len, delta = 0, len = env->prog->len;
-	struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi;
-	struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
+	struct bpf_list_insn *list, *elem;
+	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux;
+	int patch_len, ret = 0;
 	bool rnd_hi32;
 
 	rnd_hi32 = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32;
@@ -8560,12 +8559,16 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	rnd_hi32_patch[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_AX, 0);
 	rnd_hi32_patch[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_AX, 32);
 	rnd_hi32_patch[3] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, 0, BPF_REG_AX);
-	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
-		int adj_idx = i + delta;
-		struct bpf_insn insn;
 
-		insn = insns[adj_idx];
-		if (!aux[adj_idx].zext_dst) {
+	list = bpf_create_list_insn(env->prog);
+	if (IS_ERR(list))
+		return PTR_ERR(list);
+
+	for (elem = list; elem; elem = elem->next) {
+		struct bpf_insn insn = elem->insn;
+
+		aux = &env->insn_aux_data[elem->orig_idx - 1];
+		if (!aux->zext_dst) {
 			u8 code, class;
 			u32 imm_rnd;
 
@@ -8584,13 +8587,13 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			if (is_reg64(env, &insn, insn.dst_reg, NULL, DST_OP)) {
 				if (class == BPF_LD &&
 				    BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_IMM)
-					i++;
+					elem = elem->next;
 				continue;
 			}
 
 			/* ctx load could be transformed into wider load. */
 			if (class == BPF_LDX &&
-			    aux[adj_idx].ptr_type == PTR_TO_CTX)
+			    aux->ptr_type == PTR_TO_CTX)
 				continue;
 
 			imm_rnd = get_random_int();
@@ -8611,16 +8614,18 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		patch = zext_patch;
 		patch_len = 2;
 apply_patch_buffer:
-		new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, adj_idx, patch, patch_len);
-		if (!new_prog)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		env->prog = new_prog;
-		insns = new_prog->insnsi;
-		aux = env->insn_aux_data;
-		delta += patch_len - 1;
+		elem = bpf_patch_list_insn(elem, patch, patch_len);
+		if (IS_ERR(elem)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(elem);
+			goto free_list_ret;
+		}
 	}
-
-	return 0;
+	env = verifier_linearize_list_insn(env, list);
+	if (IS_ERR(env))
+		ret = PTR_ERR(env);
+free_list_ret:
+	bpf_destroy_list_insn(list);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /* convert load instructions that access fields of a context type into a
-- 
2.7.4