netdev - Re: i.mx6ul with DSA in multi chip addressing mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eedf83cd-3795-21c5-419e-6a5a8e79ace0@eks-engel.de>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:33:37 +0200
From:   Benjamin Beckmeyer <beb@...-engel.de>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: i.mx6ul with DSA in multi chip addressing mode - no MDIO access


On 03.07.19 17:55, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 03:10:34PM +0200, Benjamin Beckmeyer wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I'm having a problem with a custom i.mx6ul board. When DSA is loaded I can't 
>> get access to the switch via MDIO, but the DSA is working properly. I set up
>> a bridge for testing and the switch is in forwarding mode and i can ping the 
>> board. But the MDIO access isn't working at address 2 for the switch. When I 
>> delete the DSA from the devicetree and start the board up, I can access the 
>> switch via MDIO.
>>
>> With DSA up and running:
>>
>> mii -i 2 0 0x9800
>> mii -i 2 1
>> phyid:2, reg:0x01 -> 0x4000
>> mii -i 2 0 0x9803
>> mii -i 2 1
>> phyid:2, reg:0x01 -> 0x4000
>> mii -i 2 1 0x1883
>> mii -i 2 1
>> phyid:2, reg:0x01 -> 0x4000
> Hi Benjamin
>
> I'm guessing that the driver is also using register 0 and 1 at the
> same time you are, e.g. to poll the PHYs for link status etc.
>
> There are trace points for MDIO, so you can get the kernel to log all
> registers access. That should confirm if i'm right.
>
> 	  Andrew

Hi Andrew,
I will do so. Haven't done it before, so maybe it takes some time.

I'm just wondering why I haven't these problems with another switching
chip. Here we use the 88E6390 in multi chip addressing mode, in the 
other custom board we have a 88E6321 in single chip addressing mode, 
but there the registers would be polled too. Maybe you know a answer?

Thanks again for your fast reply.