[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190705191322.GK17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 20:13:22 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sockfs: switch to ->free_inode()
we do have an RCU-delayed part there already (freeing the wq),
so it's not like the pipe situation; moreover, it might be
worth considering coallocating wq with the rest of struct sock_alloc.
->sk_wq in struct sock would remain a pointer as it is, but
the object it normally points to would be coallocated with
struct socket...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
net/socket.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index d97b74f762e8..541719a2443d 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -258,12 +258,12 @@ static struct inode *sock_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
return &ei->vfs_inode;
}
-static void sock_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
+static void sock_free_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
struct socket_alloc *ei;
ei = container_of(inode, struct socket_alloc, vfs_inode);
- kfree_rcu(ei->socket.wq, rcu);
+ kfree(ei->socket.wq);
kmem_cache_free(sock_inode_cachep, ei);
}
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static void init_inodecache(void)
static const struct super_operations sockfs_ops = {
.alloc_inode = sock_alloc_inode,
- .destroy_inode = sock_destroy_inode,
+ .free_inode = sock_free_inode,
.statfs = simple_statfs,
};
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists