netdev - Re: [PATCH 6/7] nfp: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190705.161805.2076674582891385494.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 05 Jul 2019 16:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     bigeasy@...utronix.de
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        peterz@...radead.org, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] nfp: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Date: Thu,  4 Jul 2019 17:38:02 +0200

> For spinlocks the type spinlock_t should be used instead of "struct
> spinlock".
> 
> Use spinlock_t for spinlock's definition.
> 
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: oss-drivers@...ronome.com
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>

Applied to net-next, thanks.