[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190706062611.GA2264@nanopsycho>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 08:26:11 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com, saeedm@...lanox.com,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] devlink: Introduce PCI PF port flavour
and port attribute
Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 08:16:24AM CEST, parav@...lanox.com wrote:
>In an eswitch, PCI PF may have port which is normally represented
>using a representor netdevice.
>To have better visibility of eswitch port, its association with
>PF and a representor netdevice, introduce a PCI PF port
>flavour and port attriute.
>
>When devlink port flavour is PCI PF, fill up PCI PF attributes of the
>port.
>
>Extend port name creation using PCI PF number on best effort basis.
>So that vendor drivers can skip defining their own scheme.
>
>$ devlink port show
>pci/0000:05:00.0/0: type eth netdev eth0 flavour pcipf pfnum 0
>
>Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
>
>---
>Changelog:
>v2->v3:
> - Address comments from Jakub.
> - Made port_number and split_port_number applicable only to
> physical port flavours by having in union.
>v1->v2:
> - Limited port_num attribute to physical ports
> - Updated PCI PF attribute set API to not have port_number
>---
> include/net/devlink.h | 21 +++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 5 ++
> net/core/devlink.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>index 6625ea068d5e..1455f60e4069 100644
>--- a/include/net/devlink.h
>+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>@@ -38,13 +38,27 @@ struct devlink {
> char priv[0] __aligned(NETDEV_ALIGN);
> };
>
>+struct devlink_port_phys_attrs {
>+ u32 port_number; /* same value as "split group".
"Same" with capital letter.
>+ * A physical port which is visible to the user
>+ * for a given port flavour.
>+ */
>+ u32 split_subport_number;
>+};
>+
>+struct devlink_port_pci_pf_attrs {
>+ u16 pf; /* Associated PCI PF for this port. */
>+};
>+
> struct devlink_port_attrs {
> u8 set:1,
> split:1,
> switch_port:1;
> enum devlink_port_flavour flavour;
>- u32 port_number; /* same value as "split group" */
>- u32 split_subport_number;
>+ union {
>+ struct devlink_port_phys_attrs phys_port;
>+ struct devlink_port_pci_pf_attrs pci_pf;
Be consistent in naming: "phys", "pci_pf".
>+ };
> struct netdev_phys_item_id switch_id;
> };
>
>@@ -590,6 +604,9 @@ void devlink_port_attrs_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
> u32 split_subport_number,
> const unsigned char *switch_id,
> unsigned char switch_id_len);
>+void devlink_port_attrs_pci_pf_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>+ const unsigned char *switch_id,
>+ unsigned char switch_id_len, u16 pf);
> int devlink_sb_register(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int sb_index,
> u32 size, u16 ingress_pools_count,
> u16 egress_pools_count, u16 ingress_tc_count,
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>index 5287b42c181f..f7323884c3fe 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>@@ -169,6 +169,10 @@ enum devlink_port_flavour {
> DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_DSA, /* Distributed switch architecture
> * interconnect port.
> */
>+ DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PCI_PF, /* Represents eswitch port for
>+ * the PCI PF. It is an internal
>+ * port that faces the PCI PF.
>+ */
> };
>
> enum devlink_param_cmode {
>@@ -337,6 +341,7 @@ enum devlink_attr {
> DEVLINK_ATTR_FLASH_UPDATE_STATUS_DONE, /* u64 */
> DEVLINK_ATTR_FLASH_UPDATE_STATUS_TOTAL, /* u64 */
>
>+ DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_PF_NUMBER, /* u16 */
> /* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
>
> __DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX,
>diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>index 89c533778135..9aa36104b471 100644
>--- a/net/core/devlink.c
>+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>@@ -506,6 +506,14 @@ static void devlink_notify(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_command cmd)
> msg, 0, DEVLINK_MCGRP_CONFIG, GFP_KERNEL);
> }
>
>+static bool
>+is_devlink_phy_port_num_supported(const struct devlink_port *dl_port)
>+{
>+ return (dl_port->attrs.flavour == DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL ||
>+ dl_port->attrs.flavour == DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_CPU ||
>+ dl_port->attrs.flavour == DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_DSA);
>+}
>+
> static int devlink_nl_port_attrs_put(struct sk_buff *msg,
> struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
> {
>@@ -515,14 +523,23 @@ static int devlink_nl_port_attrs_put(struct sk_buff *msg,
> return 0;
> if (nla_put_u16(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FLAVOUR, attrs->flavour))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
>- if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_NUMBER, attrs->port_number))
>+ if (devlink_port->attrs.flavour == DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PCI_PF) {
>+ if (nla_put_u16(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_PF_NUMBER,
>+ attrs->pci_pf.pf))
>+ return -EMSGSIZE;
>+ }
>+ if (!is_devlink_phy_port_num_supported(devlink_port))
Please do the check here. No need for helper (the name with "is" and
"supported" is weird anyway.
>+ return 0;
>+ if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_NUMBER,
>+ attrs->phys_port.port_number))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> if (!attrs->split)
> return 0;
>- if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_SPLIT_GROUP, attrs->port_number))
>+ if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_SPLIT_GROUP,
>+ attrs->phys_port.port_number))
Better to split this into 2 patches. One pushing phys things into
separate struct, the second the rest.
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_SPLIT_SUBPORT_NUMBER,
>- attrs->split_subport_number))
>+ attrs->phys_port.split_subport_number))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> return 0;
> }
>@@ -5738,6 +5755,30 @@ void devlink_port_type_clear(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_type_clear);
>
>+static void __devlink_port_attrs_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>+ enum devlink_port_flavour flavour,
>+ u32 port_number,
>+ const unsigned char *switch_id,
>+ unsigned char switch_id_len)
>+{
>+ struct devlink_port_attrs *attrs = &devlink_port->attrs;
>+
>+ if (WARN_ON(devlink_port->registered))
>+ return;
>+ attrs->set = true;
>+ attrs->flavour = flavour;
>+ attrs->phys_port.port_number = port_number;
>+ if (switch_id) {
>+ attrs->switch_port = true;
>+ if (WARN_ON(switch_id_len > MAX_PHYS_ITEM_ID_LEN))
>+ switch_id_len = MAX_PHYS_ITEM_ID_LEN;
>+ memcpy(attrs->switch_id.id, switch_id, switch_id_len);
>+ attrs->switch_id.id_len = switch_id_len;
>+ } else {
>+ attrs->switch_port = false;
>+ }
>+}
>+
> /**
> * devlink_port_attrs_set - Set port attributes
> *
>@@ -5761,25 +5802,34 @@ void devlink_port_attrs_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
> {
> struct devlink_port_attrs *attrs = &devlink_port->attrs;
>
>- if (WARN_ON(devlink_port->registered))
>- return;
>- attrs->set = true;
>- attrs->flavour = flavour;
>- attrs->port_number = port_number;
>+ __devlink_port_attrs_set(devlink_port, flavour, port_number,
>+ switch_id, switch_id_len);
> attrs->split = split;
>- attrs->split_subport_number = split_subport_number;
>- if (switch_id) {
>- attrs->switch_port = true;
>- if (WARN_ON(switch_id_len > MAX_PHYS_ITEM_ID_LEN))
>- switch_id_len = MAX_PHYS_ITEM_ID_LEN;
>- memcpy(attrs->switch_id.id, switch_id, switch_id_len);
>- attrs->switch_id.id_len = switch_id_len;
>- } else {
>- attrs->switch_port = false;
>- }
>+ attrs->phys_port.split_subport_number = split_subport_number;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_attrs_set);
>
>+/**
>+ * devlink_port_attrs_pci_pf_set - Set PCI PF port attributes
>+ *
>+ * @devlink_port: devlink port
>+ * @pf: associated PF for the devlink port instance
>+ * @switch_id: if the port is part of switch, this is buffer with ID,
>+ * otwerwise this is NULL
>+ * @switch_id_len: length of the switch_id buffer
>+ */
>+void devlink_port_attrs_pci_pf_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>+ const unsigned char *switch_id,
>+ unsigned char switch_id_len, u16 pf)
>+{
>+ struct devlink_port_attrs *attrs = &devlink_port->attrs;
>+
>+ __devlink_port_attrs_set(devlink_port, DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PCI_PF,
>+ 0, switch_id, switch_id_len);
Please have this done differently. __devlink_port_attrs_set() sets
attrs->phys_port.port_number which does not make sense there.
>+ attrs->pci_pf.pf = pf;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_attrs_pci_pf_set);
>+
> static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
> char *name, size_t len)
> {
>@@ -5792,10 +5842,12 @@ static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
> switch (attrs->flavour) {
> case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL:
> if (!attrs->split)
>- n = snprintf(name, len, "p%u", attrs->port_number);
>+ n = snprintf(name, len, "p%u",
>+ attrs->phys_port.port_number);
> else
>- n = snprintf(name, len, "p%us%u", attrs->port_number,
>- attrs->split_subport_number);
>+ n = snprintf(name, len, "p%us%u",
>+ attrs->phys_port.port_number,
>+ attrs->phys_port.split_subport_number);
> break;
> case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_CPU:
> case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_DSA:
>@@ -5804,6 +5856,9 @@ static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
> */
> WARN_ON(1);
> return -EINVAL;
>+ case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PCI_PF:
>+ n = snprintf(name, len, "pf%u", attrs->pci_pf.pf);
>+ break;
> }
>
> if (n >= len)
>--
>2.19.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists