[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190708140225.42lp36fk3brcmkv3@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:02:25 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
Yossi Kuperman <yossiku@...lanox.com>,
Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...lanox.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
Zhike Wang <wangzhike@...com>,
Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>,
"nst-kernel@...hat.com" <nst-kernel@...hat.com>,
John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Justin Pettit <jpettit@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net/sched: Introduce action ct
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com> wrote:
> Like if conntrack has just timed it out (or conntrack flushed), and skb
> holds the last ref?
Yes, thats very unlikely but its possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists