netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: skip sockopt hooks without CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:26:42 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Mauricio Vasquez B <mauricio.vasquez@...ito.it>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Matt Mullins <mmullins@...com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: skip sockopt hooks without CONFIG_NET

On 07/08/2019 05:06 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> On 7/8/19 5:57 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> When CONFIG_NET is disabled, we get a link error:
>>
>> kernel/bpf/cgroup.o: In function `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt':
>> cgroup.c:(.text+0x3010): undefined reference to `lock_sock_nested'
>> cgroup.c:(.text+0x3258): undefined reference to `release_sock'
>> kernel/bpf/cgroup.o: In function `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt':
>> cgroup.c:(.text+0x3568): undefined reference to `lock_sock_nested'
>> cgroup.c:(.text+0x3870): undefined reference to `release_sock'
>> kernel/bpf/cgroup.o: In function `cg_sockopt_func_proto':
>> cgroup.c:(.text+0x41d8): undefined reference to `bpf_sk_storage_delete_proto'
>>
>> None of this code is useful in this configuration anyway, so we can
>> simply hide it in an appropriate #ifdef.
>>
>> Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> FYI.
> 
> There is already a patch to fix the same issue,
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e9e489fe-feec-a211-82aa-5df0c6a308d1@huawei.com/T/#t
> 
> which has been acked and not merged yet.

Done now, and I've also applied patch 2/2 from here, thanks.