netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] bpf: allow wide (u64) aligned stores for some fields of bpf_sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cc6a7a57-7c9d-7c3a-86d4-5e4a8a74b26b@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:25:15 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] bpf: allow wide (u64) aligned stores for
 some fields of bpf_sock_addr

On 07/01/2019 07:38 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Clang can generate 8-byte stores for user_ip6 & msg_src_ip6,
> let's support that on the verifier side.
> 
> v3:
> * fix comments spelling an -> and (Andrii Nakryiko)
> 
> v2:
> * Add simple cover letter (Yonghong Song)
> * Update comments (Yonghong Song)
> * Remove [4] selftests (Yonghong Song)
> 
> Stanislav Fomichev (3):
>   bpf: allow wide (u64) aligned stores for some fields of bpf_sock_addr
>   bpf: sync bpf.h to tools/
>   selftests/bpf: add verifier tests for wide stores
> 
>  include/linux/filter.h                        |  6 ++++
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |  6 ++--
>  net/core/filter.c                             | 22 +++++++-----
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |  6 ++--
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   | 17 +++++++--
>  .../selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_store.c       | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_store.c
> 

Applied, thanks!