[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <30ff9e8a45fa0c64d1c71bc13e217f3374f6120e.1562605180.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:59:40 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: [PATCH net-next] sctp: remove rcu_read_lock from sctp_bind_addr_state
sctp_bind_addr_state() is called either in packet rcv path or
by sctp_copy_local_addr_list(), which are under rcu_read_lock.
So there's no need to call it again in sctp_bind_addr_state().
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
net/sctp/bind_addr.c | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/bind_addr.c b/net/sctp/bind_addr.c
index f54333c..53bc615 100644
--- a/net/sctp/bind_addr.c
+++ b/net/sctp/bind_addr.c
@@ -393,24 +393,19 @@ int sctp_bind_addr_state(const struct sctp_bind_addr *bp,
{
struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *laddr;
struct sctp_af *af;
- int state = -1;
af = sctp_get_af_specific(addr->sa.sa_family);
if (unlikely(!af))
- return state;
+ return -1;
- rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(laddr, &bp->address_list, list) {
if (!laddr->valid)
continue;
- if (af->cmp_addr(&laddr->a, addr)) {
- state = laddr->state;
- break;
- }
+ if (af->cmp_addr(&laddr->a, addr))
+ return laddr->state;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return state;
+ return -1;
}
/* Find the first address in the bind address list that is not present in
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists