netdev - RE: [PATCH] rtw88/pci: Rearrange the memory usage for skb in RX ISR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F7CD281DE3E379468C6D07993EA72F84D1861A6D@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jul 2019 07:23:00 +0000
From:   Tony Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>
To:     Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux@...lessm.com" <linux@...lessm.com>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] rtw88/pci: Rearrange the memory usage for skb in RX ISR

> Subject: [PATCH] rtw88/pci: Rearrange the memory usage for skb in RX ISR

nit, "rtw88: pci:" would be better.

> 
> 
> When skb allocation fails and the "rx routine starvation" is hit, the
> function returns immediately without updating the RX ring. At this
> point, the RX ring may continue referencing an old skb which was already
> handed off to ieee80211_rx_irqsafe(). When it comes to be used again,
> bad things happen.
> 
> This patch allocates a new skb first in RX ISR. If we don't have memory
> available, we discard the current frame, allowing the existing skb to be
> reused in the ring. Otherwise, we simplify the code flow and just hand
> over the RX-populated skb over to mac80211.
> 
> In addition, to fixing the kernel crash, the RX routine should now
> generally behave better under low memory conditions.
> 
> Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204053
> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c | 28 +++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
> index cfe05ba7280d..1bfc99ae6b84 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
> @@ -786,6 +786,15 @@ static void rtw_pci_rx_isr(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> struct rtw_pci *rtwpci,
>  		rx_desc = skb->data;
>  		chip->ops->query_rx_desc(rtwdev, rx_desc, &pkt_stat, &rx_status);
> 
> +		/* discard current skb if the new skb cannot be allocated as a
> +		 * new one in rx ring later
> +		 * */

nit, comment indentation.

> +		new = dev_alloc_skb(RTK_PCI_RX_BUF_SIZE);
> +		if (WARN(!new, "rx routine starvation\n")) {
> +			new = skb;
> +			goto next_rp;
> +		}
> +
>  		/* offset from rx_desc to payload */
>  		pkt_offset = pkt_desc_sz + pkt_stat.drv_info_sz +
>  			     pkt_stat.shift;
> @@ -803,25 +812,14 @@ static void rtw_pci_rx_isr(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> struct rtw_pci *rtwpci,
>  			skb_put(skb, pkt_stat.pkt_len);
>  			skb_reserve(skb, pkt_offset);
> 
> -			/* alloc a smaller skb to mac80211 */
> -			new = dev_alloc_skb(pkt_stat.pkt_len);
> -			if (!new) {
> -				new = skb;
> -			} else {
> -				skb_put_data(new, skb->data, skb->len);
> -				dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> -			}

I am not sure if it's fine to deliver every huge SKB to mac80211.
Because it will then be delivered to TCP/IP stack.
Hence I think either it should be tested to know if the performance
would be impacted or find out a more efficient way to send
smaller SKB to mac80211 stack.

>  			/* TODO: merge into rx.c */
>  			rtw_rx_stats(rtwdev, pkt_stat.vif, skb);
> -			memcpy(new->cb, &rx_status, sizeof(rx_status));
> -			ieee80211_rx_irqsafe(rtwdev->hw, new);
> +			memcpy(skb->cb, &rx_status, sizeof(rx_status));
> +			ieee80211_rx_irqsafe(rtwdev->hw, skb);
>  		}
> 
> -		/* skb delivered to mac80211, alloc a new one in rx ring */
> -		new = dev_alloc_skb(RTK_PCI_RX_BUF_SIZE);
> -		if (WARN(!new, "rx routine starvation\n"))
> -			return;
> -
> +next_rp:
> +		/* skb delivered to mac80211, attach the new one into rx ring */
>  		ring->buf[cur_rp] = new;
>  		rtw_pci_reset_rx_desc(rtwdev, new, ring, cur_rp, buf_desc_sz);
> 

--

Yan-Hsuan