lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b40f4a39-8de4-482c-2ee8-66adf5c606be@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:22:45 -0700
From:   Gregory Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ap420073@...il.com
Cc:     dev@...nvswitch.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next] net: openvswitch: do not update
 max_headroom if new headroom is equal to old headroom



On 7/8/2019 4:18 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
> On 7/8/2019 4:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
>> Date: Sat,  6 Jul 2019 01:08:09 +0900
>>
>>> When a vport is deleted, the maximum headroom size would be changed.
>>> If the vport which has the largest headroom is deleted,
>>> the new max_headroom would be set.
>>> But, if the new headroom size is equal to the old headroom size,
>>> updating routine is unnecessary.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
>> I'm not so sure about the logic here and I'd therefore like an OVS 
>> expert
>> to review this.
>
> I'll review and test it and get back.  Pravin may have input as well.
>

Err, adding Pravin.

- Greg

> Thanks,
>
> - Greg
>
>> Thanks.
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev@...nvswitch.org
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ