netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bnxt_en: Add page_pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190709163154.GO87269@C02RW35GFVH8.dhcp.broadcom.net>
Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:31:54 -0400
From:   Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
To:     Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnxt_en: Add page_pool_destroy() during RX ring
 cleanup.

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 06:20:57PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > > Add page_pool_destroy() in bnxt_free_rx_rings() during normal RX ring
> > > cleanup, as Ilias has informed us that the following commit has been
> > > merged:
> > > 
> > > 1da4bbeffe41 ("net: core: page_pool: add user refcnt and reintroduce page_pool_destroy")
> > > 
> > > The special error handling code to call page_pool_free() can now be
> > > removed.  bnxt_free_rx_rings() will always be called during normal
> > > shutdown or any error paths.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 322b87ca55f2 ("bnxt_en: add page_pool support")
> > > Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
> > > Cc: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 8 ++------
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> > > index e9d3bd8..2b5b0ab 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> > > @@ -2500,6 +2500,7 @@ static void bnxt_free_rx_rings(struct bnxt *bp)
> > >  		if (xdp_rxq_info_is_reg(&rxr->xdp_rxq))
> > >  			xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxr->xdp_rxq);
> > >  
> > > +		page_pool_destroy(rxr->page_pool);
> > >  		rxr->page_pool = NULL;
> > >  
> > >  		kfree(rxr->rx_tpa);
> > > @@ -2560,19 +2561,14 @@ static int bnxt_alloc_rx_rings(struct bnxt *bp)
> > >  			return rc;
> > >  
> > >  		rc = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&rxr->xdp_rxq, bp->dev, i);
> > > -		if (rc < 0) {
> > > -			page_pool_free(rxr->page_pool);
> > > -			rxr->page_pool = NULL;
> > > +		if (rc < 0)
> > >  			return rc;
> > > -		}
> > >  
> > >  		rc = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&rxr->xdp_rxq,
> > >  						MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL,
> > >  						rxr->page_pool);
> > >  		if (rc) {
> > >  			xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxr->xdp_rxq);
> > > -			page_pool_free(rxr->page_pool);
> > > -			rxr->page_pool = NULL;
> > 
> > Rather than deleting these lines it would also be acceptable to do:
> > 
> >                 if (rc) {
> >                         xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rxr->xdp_rxq);
> > -                       page_pool_free(rxr->page_pool);
> > +                       page_pool_destroy(rxr->page_pool);
> >                         rxr->page_pool = NULL;
> >                         return rc;
> >                 }
> > 
> > but anytime there is a failure to bnxt_alloc_rx_rings the driver will
> > immediately follow it up with a call to bnxt_free_rx_rings, so
> > page_pool_destroy will be called.
> > 
> > Thanks for pushing this out so quickly!
> > 
> 
> I also can't find page_pool_release_page() or page_pool_put_page() called when
> destroying the pool. Can you try to insmod -> do some traffic -> rmmod ?
> If there's stale buffers that haven't been unmapped properly you'll get a
> WARN_ON for them.

I did that test a few times with a few different bpf progs but I do not
see any WARN messages.  Of course this does not mean that the code we
have is 100% correct.

Presumably you are talking about one of these messages, right?

215         /* The distance should not be able to become negative */
216         WARN(inflight < 0, "Negative(%d) inflight packet-pages", inflight);

or

356         /* Drivers should fix this, but only problematic when DMA is used */
357         WARN(1, "Still in-flight pages:%d hold:%u released:%u",
358              distance, hold_cnt, release_cnt);


> This part was added later on in the API when Jesper fixed in-flight packet
> handling