[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:30:07 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, hawk@...nel.org,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kafai@...com, mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] virtio_net: add XDP meta data support
On 2019/7/10 上午4:03, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 07/09/2019 05:04 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 2019/7/9 上午6:38, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2019 04:11 PM, Yuya Kusakabe wrote:
>>>> On 7/2/19 5:33 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>> On 2019/7/2 下午4:16, Yuya Kusakabe wrote:
>>>>>> This adds XDP meta data support to both receive_small() and
>>>>>> receive_mergeable().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: de8f3a83b0a0 ("bpf: add meta pointer for direct access")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@...il.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> v3:
>>>>>> - fix preserve the vnet header in receive_small().
>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>> - keep copy untouched in page_to_skb().
>>>>>> - preserve the vnet header in receive_small().
>>>>>> - fix indentation.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>>>> index 4f3de0ac8b0b..03a1ae6fe267 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>>>> @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>>>>> struct receive_queue *rq,
>>>>>> struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
>>>>>> unsigned int len, unsigned int truesize,
>>>>>> - bool hdr_valid)
>>>>>> + bool hdr_valid, unsigned int metasize)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>>>>>> struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr;
>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>>>>> else
>>>>>> hdr_padded_len = sizeof(struct padded_vnet_hdr);
>>>>>> - if (hdr_valid)
>>>>>> + if (hdr_valid && !metasize)
>>>>>> memcpy(hdr, p, hdr_len);
>>>>>> len -= hdr_len;
>>>>>> @@ -405,6 +405,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>>>>> copy = skb_tailroom(skb);
>>>>>> skb_put_data(skb, p, copy);
>>>>>> + if (metasize) {
>>>>>> + __skb_pull(skb, metasize);
>>>>>> + skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize);
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> len -= copy;
>>>>>> offset += copy;
>>>>>> @@ -644,6 +649,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> unsigned int delta = 0;
>>>>>> struct page *xdp_page;
>>>>>> int err;
>>>>>> + unsigned int metasize = 0;
>>>>>> len -= vi->hdr_len;
>>>>>> stats->bytes += len;
>>>>>> @@ -683,10 +689,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> xdp.data_hard_start = buf + VIRTNET_RX_PAD + vi->hdr_len;
>>>>>> xdp.data = xdp.data_hard_start + xdp_headroom;
>>>>>> - xdp_set_data_meta_invalid(&xdp);
>>>>>> xdp.data_end = xdp.data + len;
>>>>>> + xdp.data_meta = xdp.data;
>>>>>> xdp.rxq = &rq->xdp_rxq;
>>>>>> orig_data = xdp.data;
>>>>>> + /* Copy the vnet header to the front of data_hard_start to avoid
>>>>>> + * overwriting by XDP meta data */
>>>>>> + memcpy(xdp.data_hard_start - vi->hdr_len, xdp.data - vi->hdr_len, vi->hdr_len);
>>> I'm not fully sure if I'm following this one correctly, probably just missing
>>> something. Isn't the vnet header based on how we set up xdp.data_hard_start
>>> earlier already in front of it? Wouldn't we copy invalid data from xdp.data -
>>> vi->hdr_len into the vnet header at that point (given there can be up to 256
>>> bytes of headroom between the two)? If it's relative to xdp.data and headroom
>>> is >0, then BPF prog could otherwise mangle this; something doesn't add up to
>>> me here. Could you clarify? Thx
>> Vnet headr sits just in front of xdp.data not xdp.data_hard_start. So it could be overwrote by metadata, that's why we need a copy here.
> For the current code, you can adjust the xdp.data with a positive/negative offset
> already via bpf_xdp_adjust_head() helper. If vnet headr sits just in front of
> xdp.data, couldn't this be overridden today as well then? Anyway, just wondering
> how this is handled differently?
We will invalidate the vnet header in this case. But for the case of
metadata adjustment without header adjustment, we want to seek a way to
preserve that.
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists