[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190709193846.62f0a2c7@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:38:46 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH v2 6/6] bpf: sockmap/tls, close can race with map
free
On Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:15:18 +0000, John Fastabend wrote:
> @@ -352,15 +354,18 @@ static void tls_sk_proto_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> if (ctx->tx_conf == TLS_BASE && ctx->rx_conf == TLS_BASE)
> goto skip_tx_cleanup;
>
> - sk->sk_prot = ctx->sk_proto;
> tls_sk_proto_cleanup(sk, ctx, timeo);
>
> skip_tx_cleanup:
> + write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> + icsk->icsk_ulp_data = NULL;
Is ulp_data pointer now supposed to be updated under the
sk_callback_lock?
> + if (sk->sk_prot->close == tls_sk_proto_close)
> + sk->sk_prot = ctx->sk_proto;
> + write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> release_sock(sk);
> if (ctx->rx_conf == TLS_SW)
> tls_sw_release_strp_rx(ctx);
> - sk_proto_close(sk, timeout);
> -
> + ctx->sk_proto_close(sk, timeout);
> if (ctx->tx_conf != TLS_HW && ctx->rx_conf != TLS_HW &&
> ctx->tx_conf != TLS_HW_RECORD && ctx->rx_conf != TLS_HW_RECORD)
> tls_ctx_free(ctx);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists