[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f945be07-cc11-75c5-7a0b-2953fc1a29e1@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 22:24:51 +0800
From: Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net][PATCH 3/5] rds: Accept peer connection reject messages due
to incompatible version
On 2019/7/10 13:32, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> From: Gerd Rausch <gerd.rausch@...cle.com>
>
> Prior to
> commit d021fabf525ff ("rds: rdma: add consumer reject")
>
> function "rds_rdma_cm_event_handler_cmn" would always honor a rejected
> connection attempt by issuing a "rds_conn_drop".
>
> The commit mentioned above added a "break", eliminating
> the "fallthrough" case and made the "rds_conn_drop" rather conditional:
>
> Now it only happens if a "consumer defined" reject (i.e. "rdma_reject")
> carries an integer-value of "1" inside "private_data":
>
> if (!conn)
> break;
> err = (int *)rdma_consumer_reject_data(cm_id, event, &len);
> if (!err || (err && ((*err) == RDS_RDMA_REJ_INCOMPAT))) {
> pr_warn("RDS/RDMA: conn <%pI6c, %pI6c> rejected, dropping connection\n",
> &conn->c_laddr, &conn->c_faddr);
> conn->c_proposed_version = RDS_PROTOCOL_COMPAT_VERSION;
> rds_conn_drop(conn);
> }
> rdsdebug("Connection rejected: %s\n",
> rdma_reject_msg(cm_id, event->status));
> break;
> /* FALLTHROUGH */
> A number of issues are worth mentioning here:
> #1) Previous versions of the RDS code simply rejected a connection
> by calling "rdma_reject(cm_id, NULL, 0);"
> So the value of the payload in "private_data" will not be "1",
> but "0".
>
> #2) Now the code has become dependent on host byte order and sizing.
> If one peer is big-endian, the other is little-endian,
> or there's a difference in sizeof(int) (e.g. ILP64 vs LP64),
> the *err check does not work as intended.
>
> #3) There is no check for "len" to see if the data behind *err is even valid.
> Luckily, it appears that the "rdma_reject(cm_id, NULL, 0)" will always
> carry 148 bytes of zeroized payload.
> But that should probably not be relied upon here.
>
> #4) With the added "break;",
> we might as well drop the misleading "/* FALLTHROUGH */" comment.
>
> This commit does _not_ address issue #2, as the sender would have to
> agree on a byte order as well.
>
> Here is the sequence of messages in this observed error-scenario:
> Host-A is pre-QoS changes (excluding the commit mentioned above)
> Host-B is post-QoS changes (including the commit mentioned above)
>
> #1 Host-B
> issues a connection request via function "rds_conn_path_transition"
> connection state transitions to "RDS_CONN_CONNECTING"
>
> #2 Host-A
> rejects the incompatible connection request (from #1)
> It does so by calling "rdma_reject(cm_id, NULL, 0);"
>
> #3 Host-B
> receives an "RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED" event (from #2)
> But since the code is changed in the way described above,
> it won't drop the connection here, simply because "*err == 0".
>
> #4 Host-A
> issues a connection request
>
> #5 Host-B
> receives an "RDMA_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_REQUEST" event
> and ends up calling "rds_ib_cm_handle_connect".
> But since the state is already in "RDS_CONN_CONNECTING"
> (as of #1) it will end up issuing a "rdma_reject" without
> dropping the connection:
> if (rds_conn_state(conn) == RDS_CONN_CONNECTING) {
> /* Wait and see - our connect may still be succeeding */
> rds_ib_stats_inc(s_ib_connect_raced);
> }
> goto out;
>
> #6 Host-A
> receives an "RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED" event (from #5),
> drops the connection and tries again (goto #4) until it gives up.
>
> Tested-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
Thanks
Zhu Yanjun
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Rausch <gerd.rausch@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
> ---
> net/rds/rdma_transport.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rds/rdma_transport.c b/net/rds/rdma_transport.c
> index 46bce83..9db455d 100644
> --- a/net/rds/rdma_transport.c
> +++ b/net/rds/rdma_transport.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,9 @@ static int rds_rdma_cm_event_handler_cmn(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
> if (!conn)
> break;
> err = (int *)rdma_consumer_reject_data(cm_id, event, &len);
> - if (!err || (err && ((*err) == RDS_RDMA_REJ_INCOMPAT))) {
> + if (!err ||
> + (err && len >= sizeof(*err) &&
> + ((*err) <= RDS_RDMA_REJ_INCOMPAT))) {
> pr_warn("RDS/RDMA: conn <%pI6c, %pI6c> rejected, dropping connection\n",
> &conn->c_laddr, &conn->c_faddr);
> conn->c_proposed_version = RDS_PROTOCOL_COMPAT_VERSION;
> @@ -122,7 +124,6 @@ static int rds_rdma_cm_event_handler_cmn(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
> rdsdebug("Connection rejected: %s\n",
> rdma_reject_msg(cm_id, event->status));
> break;
> - /* FALLTHROUGH */
> case RDMA_CM_EVENT_ADDR_ERROR:
> case RDMA_CM_EVENT_ROUTE_ERROR:
> case RDMA_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_ERROR:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists