netdev - [PATCH net-next v3] net/mlx5e: Convert single case statement switch statements into if statements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  9 Jul 2019 23:06:15 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3] net/mlx5e: Convert single case statement switch statements into if statements

During the review of commit 1ff2f0fa450e ("net/mlx5e: Return in default
case statement in tx_post_resync_params"), Leon and Nick pointed out
that the switch statements can be converted to single if statements
that return early so that the code is easier to follow.

Suggested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
---

v1 -> v2:

* Refactor switch statements into if statements

v2 -> v3:

* Rebase on net-next after v1 was already applied, patch just refactors
  switch statements to if statements.

 .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c     | 34 ++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c
index 5c08891806f0..ea032f54197e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c
@@ -25,23 +25,17 @@ static void
 fill_static_params_ctx(void *ctx, struct mlx5e_ktls_offload_context_tx *priv_tx)
 {
 	struct tls_crypto_info *crypto_info = priv_tx->crypto_info;
+	struct tls12_crypto_info_aes_gcm_128 *info;
 	char *initial_rn, *gcm_iv;
 	u16 salt_sz, rec_seq_sz;
 	char *salt, *rec_seq;
 	u8 tls_version;
 
-	switch (crypto_info->cipher_type) {
-	case TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128: {
-		struct tls12_crypto_info_aes_gcm_128 *info =
-			(struct tls12_crypto_info_aes_gcm_128 *)crypto_info;
-
-		EXTRACT_INFO_FIELDS;
-		break;
-	}
-	default:
-		WARN_ON(1);
+	if (WARN_ON(crypto_info->cipher_type != TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128))
 		return;
-	}
+
+	info = (struct tls12_crypto_info_aes_gcm_128 *)crypto_info;
+	EXTRACT_INFO_FIELDS;
 
 	gcm_iv      = MLX5_ADDR_OF(tls_static_params, ctx, gcm_iv);
 	initial_rn  = MLX5_ADDR_OF(tls_static_params, ctx, initial_record_number);
@@ -234,24 +228,18 @@ tx_post_resync_params(struct mlx5e_txqsq *sq,
 		      u64 rcd_sn)
 {
 	struct tls_crypto_info *crypto_info = priv_tx->crypto_info;
+	struct tls12_crypto_info_aes_gcm_128 *info;
 	__be64 rn_be = cpu_to_be64(rcd_sn);
 	bool skip_static_post;
 	u16 rec_seq_sz;
 	char *rec_seq;
 
-	switch (crypto_info->cipher_type) {
-	case TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128: {
-		struct tls12_crypto_info_aes_gcm_128 *info =
-			(struct tls12_crypto_info_aes_gcm_128 *)crypto_info;
-
-		rec_seq = info->rec_seq;
-		rec_seq_sz = sizeof(info->rec_seq);
-		break;
-	}
-	default:
-		WARN_ON(1);
+	if (WARN_ON(crypto_info->cipher_type != TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128))
 		return;
-	}
+
+	info = (struct tls12_crypto_info_aes_gcm_128 *)crypto_info;
+	rec_seq = info->rec_seq;
+	rec_seq_sz = sizeof(info->rec_seq);
 
 	skip_static_post = !memcmp(rec_seq, &rn_be, rec_seq_sz);
 	if (!skip_static_post)
-- 
2.22.0