[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D784EE92-0B53-4D9F-BBD0-46DDA1483573@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:59:39 +0200
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix bpf_target_sparc check
> Am 09.07.2019 um 19:56 schrieb Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>:
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:22 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> bpf_helpers.h fails to compile on sparc: the code should be checking
>> for defined(bpf_target_sparc), but checks simply for bpf_target_sparc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
>> index 5f6f9e7aba2a..a8fea087aa90 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
>> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_adjust_room)(void *ctx, __s32 len_diff, __u32 mode,
>> #ifdef bpf_target_powerpc
>
> While at it, can you please also fix this one?
Do you mean #ifdef bpf_target_powerpc? I think it’s correct, because it’s #ifdef, not #if.
But I could change it to #if defined() for consistency.
Best regards,
Ilya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists