lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <51821F5F-A70F-485B-B6E7-CAE6D49B6D1D@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:00:37 +0200
From:   Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf] selftests/bpf: do not ignore clang failures

> Am 11.07.2019 um 16:55 schrieb Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:14 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> In addition, pull Kbuild.include in order to get .DELETE_ON_ERROR target,
> 
> In your original patch you explicitly declared .DELETE_ON_ERROR, but
> in this one you just include Kbuild.include.
> Is it enough to just include that file to get desired behavior or your
> forgot to add .DELETE_ON_ERROR?

It’s enough to just include Kbuild.include. I grepped the source tree
and found that no one else declares .DELETE_ON_ERROR explicitly, so I've
decided to avoid doing this as well.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ