netdev - [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: remove logic duplication in test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:08:44 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
To:     <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, <kernel-team@...com>, <ast@...com>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@...volk.io>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: remove logic duplication in test_verifier.c

test_verifier tests can specify single- and multi-runs tests. Internally
logic of handling them is duplicated. Get rid of it by making single run
retval specification to be a first retvals spec.

Cc: Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@...volk.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 37 ++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index b0773291012a..120ecdf4a7db 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
 	int fixup_sk_storage_map[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	const char *errstr;
 	const char *errstr_unpriv;
-	uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv, insn_processed;
+	uint32_t insn_processed;
 	int prog_len;
 	enum {
 		UNDEF,
@@ -95,16 +95,24 @@ struct bpf_test {
 	} result, result_unpriv;
 	enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
 	uint8_t flags;
-	__u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN];
 	void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self);
 	uint8_t runs;
-	struct {
-		uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;
-		union {
-			__u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN];
-			__u64 data64[TEST_DATA_LEN / 8];
+	union {
+		struct {
+			uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;
+			union {
+				__u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN];
+				__u64 data64[TEST_DATA_LEN / 8];
+			};
 		};
-	} retvals[MAX_TEST_RUNS];
+		struct {
+			uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;
+			union {
+				__u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN];
+				__u64 data64[TEST_DATA_LEN / 8];
+			};
+		} retvals[MAX_TEST_RUNS];
+	};
 	enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
 };
 
@@ -949,17 +957,8 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
 		uint32_t expected_val;
 		int i;
 
-		if (!test->runs) {
-			expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ?
-				test->retval_unpriv : test->retval;
-
-			err = do_prog_test_run(fd_prog, unpriv, expected_val,
-					       test->data, sizeof(test->data));
-			if (err)
-				run_errs++;
-			else
-				run_successes++;
-		}
+		if (!test->runs)
+			test->runs = 1;
 
 		for (i = 0; i < test->runs; i++) {
 			if (unpriv && test->retvals[i].retval_unpriv)
-- 
2.17.1