[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <715a1bc4-abd4-90bb-2e2f-1a2da8fd861d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:55:22 -0700
From: Gregory Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ap420073@...il.com,
ovs dev <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next] net: openvswitch: do not update
max_headroom if new headroom is equal to old headroom
On 7/11/2019 2:07 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> I was bit busy for last couple of days. I will finish review by EOD today.
>
> Thanks,
> Pravin.
net-next is closed anyway so no rush, but thanks!
- Greg
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:22 PM Gregory Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/8/2019 4:18 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>>> On 7/8/2019 4:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>>> From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
>>>> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 01:08:09 +0900
>>>>
>>>>> When a vport is deleted, the maximum headroom size would be changed.
>>>>> If the vport which has the largest headroom is deleted,
>>>>> the new max_headroom would be set.
>>>>> But, if the new headroom size is equal to the old headroom size,
>>>>> updating routine is unnecessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
>>>> I'm not so sure about the logic here and I'd therefore like an OVS
>>>> expert
>>>> to review this.
>>> I'll review and test it and get back. Pravin may have input as well.
>>>
>> Err, adding Pravin.
>>
>> - Greg
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - Greg
>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dev mailing list
>>>> dev@...nvswitch.org
>>>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists