[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190712152122.GC27526@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:21:26 +0000
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Bernard Metzler <BMT@...ich.ibm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:45:57AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:33:07 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've added this patch to the rdma tree to fix the missing locking.
> >
> > The merge resolution will be simply swapping
> > for_ifa to in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl.
>
> OK, I added the below merge resolution patch to the merge of the rdma
> tree today (since Linus' has merged the net-next tree now).
Yes, this is what I'm planning on using
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists