[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYwwqn9ATwPyVcJ8nBQM+rvaFp7KBFjqbYY4GKda3G8jA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:53:05 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Y Song <ys114321@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: compile progs with -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH)
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 7:32 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> This opens up the possibility of accessing registers in an
> arch-independent way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 2620406a53ec..ad84450e4ab8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +include ../../../scripts/Makefile.arch
>
> LIBDIR := ../../../lib
> BPFDIR := $(LIBDIR)/bpf
> @@ -138,7 +139,8 @@ CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES := $(shell $(CLANG) -v -E - </dev/null 2>&1 \
>
> CLANG_FLAGS = -I. -I./include/uapi -I../../../include/uapi \
> $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types
> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types \
> + -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH)
samples/bpf/Makefile uses $(ARCH), why does it work for samples?
Should we update samples/bpf/Makefile as well?
>
> $(OUTPUT)/test_l4lb_noinline.o: CLANG_FLAGS += -fno-inline
> $(OUTPUT)/test_xdp_noinline.o: CLANG_FLAGS += -fno-inline
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists