[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190712174528.1767-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:45:28 +0200
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gor@...ux.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix test_send_signal_nmi on s390
Many s390 setups (most notably, KVM guests) do not have access to
hardware performance events.
Therefore, use the software event instead.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
index 67cea1686305..4a45ea0b8448 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
@@ -176,10 +176,19 @@ static int test_send_signal_tracepoint(void)
static int test_send_signal_nmi(void)
{
struct perf_event_attr attr = {
+#if defined(__s390__)
+ /* Many s390 setups (most notably, KVM guests) do not have
+ * access to hardware performance events.
+ */
+ .sample_period = 1,
+ .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
+ .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK,
+#else
.sample_freq = 50,
.freq = 1,
.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
+#endif
};
return test_send_signal_common(&attr, BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, "perf_event");
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists