netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: openvswitch: do not update max_headroom if new headroom is equal to old headroom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:11:24 -0700
From:   Gregory Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ap420073@...il.com
Cc:     pshelar@....org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: openvswitch: do not update max_headroom if
 new headroom is equal to old headroom



On 7/12/2019 3:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
> Date: Sat,  6 Jul 2019 01:08:09 +0900
>
>> When a vport is deleted, the maximum headroom size would be changed.
>> If the vport which has the largest headroom is deleted,
>> the new max_headroom would be set.
>> But, if the new headroom size is equal to the old headroom size,
>> updating routine is unnecessary.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
> I don't think Taehee should be punished because it took several days
> to get someone to look at and review and/or test this patch and
> meanwhile the net-next tree closed down.
>
> I ask for maintainer review as both a courtesy and a way to lessen
> my workload.  But if that means patches rot for days in patchwork
> I'm just going to apply them after my own review.
>
> So I'm applying this now.
>
My apologies Dave.  I did test and review the patch, perhaps you didn't 
see it.  In any case, you're right, Taehee was owed a more timely review 
and I missed it.

Thanks for applying the patch.

- Greg