| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1821c501-3c86-2ac5-dc86-232c30a8a83e@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:11:24 -0700 From: Gregory Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ap420073@...il.com Cc: pshelar@....org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: openvswitch: do not update max_headroom if new headroom is equal to old headroom On 7/12/2019 3:18 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com> > Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 01:08:09 +0900 > >> When a vport is deleted, the maximum headroom size would be changed. >> If the vport which has the largest headroom is deleted, >> the new max_headroom would be set. >> But, if the new headroom size is equal to the old headroom size, >> updating routine is unnecessary. >> >> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com> > I don't think Taehee should be punished because it took several days > to get someone to look at and review and/or test this patch and > meanwhile the net-next tree closed down. > > I ask for maintainer review as both a courtesy and a way to lessen > my workload. But if that means patches rot for days in patchwork > I'm just going to apply them after my own review. > > So I'm applying this now. > My apologies Dave. I did test and review the patch, perhaps you didn't see it. In any case, you're right, Taehee was owed a more timely review and I missed it. Thanks for applying the patch. - Greg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists