netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Add drop monitor for offloaded data paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:40:34 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        jiri@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com, dsahern@...il.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
        andy@...yhouse.net, pablo@...filter.org,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, idosch@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Add drop monitor for offloaded data paths



On 7/11/2019 4:53 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>> I would like to emphasize that the configuration of whether these
>> dropped packets are even sent to the CPU from the device still needs to
>> reside in devlink given this is the go-to tool for device-specific
>> configuration. In addition, these drop traps are a small subset of the
>> entire packet traps devices support and all have similar needs such as
>> HW policer configuration and statistics.
>>
>> In the future we might also want to report events that indicate the
>> formation of possible problems. For example, in case packets are queued
>> above a certain threshold or for long periods of time. I hope we could
>> re-use drop_monitor for this as well, thereby making it the go-to
>> channel for diagnosing current and to-be problems in the data path.
>>
> Thats an interesting idea, but dropwatch certainly isn't currently setup for
> that kind of messaging.  It may be worth creating a v2 of the netlink protocol
> and really thinking out what you want to communicate.

Is not what you describe more or less what Ido has been doing here with
this patch series?
-- 
Florian