[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F9859C57-4F6D-4685-B4B6-D1D7DCB50D27@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:00:58 +0800
From: Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: Make speed detection on
hotplugging cable more reliable
at 4:52 PM, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de> wrote:
> Dear Kai-Heng,
>
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On 7/15/19 10:43 AM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>> After hotplugging an 1Gbps ethernet cable with 1Gbps link partner, the
>> MII_BMSR may reports 10Mbps, renders the network rather slow.
>
> s/may reports/may report/
> s/renders/rendering/
Apparently English isn’t my mother tongue ;)
>
>> The issue has much lower fail rate after commit 59653e6497d1 ("e1000e:
>> Make watchdog use delayed work"), which esssentially introduces some
>
> essentially
Ok.
>
>> delay before running the watchdog task.
>>
>> But there's still a chance that the hotplugging event and the queued
>> watchdog task gets run at the same time, then the original issue can be
>> observed once again.
>>
>> So let's use mod_delayed_work() to add a deterministic 1 second delay
>> before running watchdog task, after an interrupt.
>
> I am not clear about the effects for the user. Could you elaborate
> please? Does the link now come up up to one second later?
Yes, the link will be up on a fixed one second later.
The delay varies between 0 to 2 seconds without this patch.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
>
> Any bug URL?
If maintainers think it’s necessary then I’ll file one.
Kai-Heng
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists